با همکاری انجمن آبخیزداری ایران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه جغرافیای طبیعی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران

2 گروه جغرافیای طبیعی، دانشکده علوم جغرافیایی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران

چکیده

تغییراتی که درکیفیت مورفولوژیکی یک رودخانه رخ می‌دهد حاصل تداخل‌های انسانی و نیز تغییرات در مورفولوژی رودخانه است. رودخانه طالقان یکی از منابع مهم آب در آبیاری محصولات کشاورزی دشت قزوین محسوب می‌شود. با توجه به اهمیت اقتصادی سد طالقان بر روی این رودخانه و نیز جنس زمین، بعضی از بازه‌های این رودخانه دچار تغییراتی شده است؛ لذا، ارزیابی کیفیت مورفولوژیکی این رودخانه به‌منظور اهداف برنامه‌ریزی حائز اهمیت است. هدف از این پژوهش ارزیابی کیفیت مورفولوژیکی رودخانه طالقان بر اساس روش شاخص کیفیت مورفولوژی بازبینی‌شده (rMQI) است. روش امتیازدهی rMQI به کمی سازی تغییرات رودخانه می‌پردازد و آن زمانی است که رودخانه با شرایط مرجع خود مقایسه شود. مقدار شاخص rMQI منطبق با کمتر از 30% نشان‌دهنده وضعیت بسیار خوب رودخانه است و بیشتر از 30% بیانگر کیفیت بسیار ضعیف رودخانه است. نتایج پژوهش حاضر نشان داد که تمام بازه‌های رودخانه طالقان دارای وضعیت بسیار ضعیف هستند. علت این وضعیت بسیار ضعیف، مئاندرشدگی رودخانه و دخالت‌های انسانی در بخش بالادست حوزه است. به‌منظور احیای رودخانه طالقان و بهبود کیفیت آب آن محافظت از پوشش گیاهی طبیعی و افزایش آن، جلوگیری از تخریب کاربری اراضی در بالادست حوزه و همچنین کنترل فرسایش کناری رودخانه از طریق اقدامات سازه‌ای و غیر سازه‌ای توصیه می‌شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Morphological Quality Evaluation of Taleghan River

نویسندگان [English]

  • Nazila Yaghoob Nejad ASL 1
  • Fariba Esfandiary Darabad 1
  • Sayyad Asghari Saraskanroud 1
  • Amir Karam 2

1 physical Geography, Faculty of Literature & Humanities, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran

2 physical Geography, Faculty of Geographical Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran

چکیده [English]

Alterations in river morphological quality are derived from quantification of human pressures as well as river morphological alteration. Taleghan River is an important source of water for the irrigation of Agri cultural lands in Qazvin Plain. For some economic considerations of Taleghan dam reservoir on the river as well as geology, some reaches of the river have undergone alterations. It seems important to morphological quality assessment in order to planning issues. Our study’s aim is to contribute to the morphological quality evaluation based on a revisited Morphological Quality Index (rMQI) protocol. The rMQI scoring system allows for the quantification of changes when compared to reference conditions. The rMQI corresponds to less than 30%, reflecting a good morphological quality; the rMQI corresponds to more than 30%, reflecting an extremely poor morphological quality. In this context, the paper presents all of the Taleghan River reaches suffer from an extremely poor morphological quality. Causes of degradation are meandering as well as numerous anthropogenic pressures in the upstream part of the basin. In order to revive Taleghan River as well as improve its water quality, preserving and remediating native vegetation, prevention and remediation of land use degradation in upstream's basin as well as river bank erosion control measures can use hard and soft strategies engineering are recommended.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Indicator
  • River reaches
  • (rMQI) protocol
  • River reach disturbed
  1. Alam, J.B., M. Uddin, A. Uddin, J. Cacovean, H. Habibur Rahman, M. Banik and N. Yesmin. 2007. Study of morphological change of river old Brahmaputra and its social impacts by remote sensing. Journal of Geographia Technica, 2: 1-11.
  2. Esmaili, R. and S. Valikhani. 2014. Evaluation and analysis of Lavij River hydromorphological conditions using morphological quality index. Journal of Geomorphological Researches, 2: 37-53 (in Persian).
  3. Asghari Sareskanroud, S. 2017. Channel form analysis of Kalghan Chi River in mountain interval (between Kalghan Dam to Connection of Garango River). Journal of Geomorphological Researches, 6: 37-53 (in Persian).

4.     Alaee Taleghani, M., F. Haseli and M. Ahmadi. 2013. Assessing human role in lateral erosion and lateral extension of Gamasiab River in Bistoon Plain. Journal of Geography and Sustainability of Environment, 3: 107-120 (in Persian).  

  1. Bravard, J.P., P. Fagot, P. Gadiolet and M. Magne. 1989. Étude de dendrochronologie dans le lit majeur de de l’Ain: la forêt alluviale comme descripteur d’une métamorphose fluviale. Journal of Revue de Géographie de Lyon, 64: 213-223.
  2. Charlton, R. 2008. Fundamentals of fluvial geomorphology. London, Routledge Taylor and Francis Group publication, 224 pages.
  3. European Commission. 2015. Directive 2000/60/EC. Establishing a Framework for Community Action in the Field of Water Policy, available online at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/ 304922114_Directive_200060EC_establishing_a_framework_for_community_action_in_the_field_of_water_policy.
  4. European Topic Centre on Inland, Coastal and Marine Waters. 2012. Hydromorphological alterations and pressures in European rivers, lakes, transitional and coastal waters, available online at: https://www.ecologic.eu/11663.
  5. Gălie, A., V. Popescu and C. 2015. Assessment of the ecological status using different quality elements in the Prut River Basin. Work Package 6, South-East Europe Transnational Cooperation Programme, co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund, Pilot Case Studies, 1-35.
  6. Karam, A., T. Kiani and S. Layeghi. 2015. Hydrogeomorphological evaluation using Rosgen Classification Method. Journal Management System, 3: 11-24 (in Persian).
  7. Kiani, T. and M. Pourbashir Hir. 2018. Analyzing the hydro-morphological indicators of the Balharoud River with the aim of determining the trend and causes of riverbed change. Researches in Geographical Sciences, 18: 111-125 (in Persian).
  8. Noor, H., M. Vafakhah, M. Taheriyoun and M. 2014. Hydrology modelling in Taleghan mountainous watershed using SWAT. Journal of Water and Land Development, 20: 11-18.
  9. Rigon, E., J. Moretto, R. Rainato, M. Lenzi and A. 2013. Evaluation of the morphological quality index in the Cordevole River (Bl, Italy). Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 3: 103–113.
  10. Rezaei Moghaddam, M.H., I. Jabbary and N. Pirozynezhad. 2016. A Study of meandering, braided and ana branching channel plan forms, using sinuosity and braided indexes in Gamasiab River. Journal of Watershed Management Research, 7: 272-283 (in Persian).
  11. Rinaldi, M., N. Surian, F. Comiti and M. Bussettini. 2013. A method for the assessment and analysis of the hydromorphological condition of Italian streams: the Morphological Quality Index (MQI). Journal of Geomorphology, 180-181: 96-108.
  12. Şerban, P. and D. Rădulescu. 2004. Abiotic criteria for the heavily modified water bodies designation. In Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on River Restoration, Zagreb, Croatia, 355-365.

17. Shakerizare, H., A. Behnyafar, A. Gorbanishorestan and M. Hashemi. 2014. Studying geomorphological changes of Harirud River and its impact on international border. Journal of Geography and Sustainability of Environment, 4: 57-70 (in Persian).

  1. Tecuci, I. and M. 2014. The assessment of hydromorphological status of Romanian rivers. Air Water Components, Environment Conference, 78-85.
  2. Yamani, M. and M. Toorani. 2012. Geomorphological classification of Taleghan River pattern in Taleghan Town by Rozgen Method. Journal of Physical Geography Research, 46: 183-198 (in Persian).
  3. Zaharia, G.I. and M.T. Lili. 2015. Using pressure and alteration indicators to assess river morphological quality, case study of the Prahova River (Romania). Journal of Water, 7: 2971-2989.
  4. Zaharia, L., I.T. Gabriela, O. Cocoş, F.A. Ghiţă and E. Mailat. 2016. Urbanization effects on the river systems in the Bucharest City region (Romania). Journal of Ecosystem Health and Sustainability, 2: 1-19.
  5. , L., I.T. Gabriela, G. Adina Moroşanu, A. Cristina Gălie, M. Moldoveanu, I. Čanjevac, B. Belleudy, M. Plantak Buzjak, N. Bočić, C. Legout, S. Bigot and N. Ciobotaru. 2018. Review of national methodologies for rivers' hydromorphological assessment: a comparative approach in France, Romania and Croatia. Journal of Environmental Management, 217: 735-746.